1993 Renault Clio vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Clio (148 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. (95 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 70 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Renault Clio | 2008 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Renault | Mitsubishi |
Model | Clio | Colt |
Year Released | 1993 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |