1993 Renault Clio vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman H
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Chairman H is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Chairman H is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SsangYong Chairman H (209 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (148 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SsangYong Chairman H should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Chairman H weights approximately 637 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Chairman H (318 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 SsangYong Chairman H will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Renault Clio | 2010 SsangYong Chairman H | |
Make | Renault | SsangYong |
Model | Clio | Chairman H |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 318 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1637 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |