1993 Renault Clio vs. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser
To start off, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (260 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser weights approximately 875 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser (367 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Renault Clio | 2010 Toyota FJ Cruiser | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | FJ Cruiser |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Size | 1764 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 367 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4671 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1811 mm |