1993 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Acura RL
To start off, 2011 Acura RL is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (148 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura RL weights approximately 852 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Acura RL (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (182 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2011 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Renault Clio | 2011 Acura RL | |
Make | Renault | Acura |
Model | Clio | RL |
Year Released | 1993 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 367 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4971 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1847 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1453 mm |