1993 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 989 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Renault Clio | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | Clio | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Size | 1764 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1964 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1727 mm |