1993 Rover 200 vs. 1998 Zagato Zuma
To start off, 1998 Zagato Zuma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,894 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Zagato Zuma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Rover 200 (121 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1998 Zagato Zuma. (108 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Zagato Zuma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Zagato Zuma weights approximately 10 kg more than 1993 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Zagato Zuma (235 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Zagato Zuma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Rover 200 | 1998 Zagato Zuma | |
| Make | Rover | Zagato |
| Model | 200 | Zuma |
| Year Released | 1993 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1894 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 121 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4150 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2520 mm |
