1993 Rover 200 vs. 2003 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2003 Samsung SM3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Samsung SM3 (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Samsung SM3 should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Rover 200 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2003 Samsung SM3.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Rover 200 (180 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm). This means 1993 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Rover 200 | 2003 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Rover | Samsung |
| Model | 200 | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
