1993 Rover 200 vs. 2005 Volvo S40
To start off, 2005 Volvo S40 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,950 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S40 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S40 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo S40 (340 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (180 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Rover 200 | 2005 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Rover | Volvo |
| Model | 200 | S40 |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
