1993 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 571 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Rover 200 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Rover | Cadillac |
| Model | 200 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1993 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1756 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1504 mm |
