1993 Rover 200 vs. 2010 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2010 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Sequoia (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 260 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1566 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Sequoia (543 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 398 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Rover 200 | 2010 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 200 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 121 HP | 381 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 543 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 2606 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2027 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1895 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3099 mm |
