1993 Rover 200 vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 35 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1993 Rover 200 (180 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm). This means 1993 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 1993 Rover 200 | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Rover | Honda |
| Model | 200 | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
