1993 Rover 200 vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Rover 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Rover 200 | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Rover | Mazda |
Model | 200 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3010 mm |