1993 Rover 200 vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (121 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 777 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Rover 200 | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Rover | Cadillac |
Model | 200 | XTS |
Year Released | 1993 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 121 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2831 mm |