1993 Suzuki Swift vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C30 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1993 Suzuki Swift. (69 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1993 Suzuki Swift.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C30 (240 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Suzuki Swift. (103 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Suzuki Swift | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Suzuki | Volvo |
Model | Swift | C30 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |