1993 Volvo 960 vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1993 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1993 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Volvo 960 weights approximately 79 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Volvo 960. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1993 Volvo 960 has manual transmission. 1993 Volvo 960 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Volvo 960 | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Volvo | Volvo |
Model | 960 | S60 |
Year Released | 1993 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 187 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2720 mm |