1993 Xedos 6 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Xedos 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Xedos 6 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Xedos 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Xedos 6 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1993 Xedos 6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 355 kg more than 1993 Xedos 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Xedos 6. (170 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Xedos 6.
Compare all specifications:
1993 Xedos 6 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Xedos | Ford |
Model | 6 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1993 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2788 mm |