1994 Acura Integra vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1994 Acura Integra is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 861 kg more than 1994 Acura Integra.
Because 1965 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Acura Integra | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | Integra | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 95 L |
