1994 Acura Integra vs. 2000 Caterham 21
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Acura Integra would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Acura Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Acura Integra weights approximately 714 kg more than 2000 Caterham 21.
Because 2000 Caterham 21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Acura Integra | 2000 Caterham 21 | |
Make | Acura | Caterham |
Model | Integra | 21 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.2 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 241 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 100 L |