1994 Acura Integra vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 231 kg more than 1994 Acura Integra.
Because 2002 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Acura Integra | 2002 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Acura | Opel |
| Model | Integra | Omega |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87.2 mm | 82.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1254 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 75 L |
