1994 Acura NSX vs. 1995 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Acura NSX would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Acura NSX (271 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1995 Ford Ranger. (148 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Ranger weights approximately 58 kg more than 1994 Acura NSX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Acura NSX (284 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Ranger. (257 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 1994 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Acura NSX | 1995 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | NSX | Ranger |
Year Released | 1994 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 2982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 7300 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 284 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5400 RPM | 2650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2840 mm |