1994 Acura NSX vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO

To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Acura NSX would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Acura NSX (271 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.

Because 1994 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Acura NSX (284 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1994 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO has automatic transmission and 1994 Acura NSX has manual transmission. 1994 Acura NSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: