1994 Alfa Romeo 145 vs. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 1994 Alfa Romeo 145 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Alfa Romeo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 40 kg more than 1994 Alfa Romeo 145.
Because 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Alfa Romeo 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Alfa Romeo 145 | 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin-Healey |
Model | 145 | Sprite |
Year Released | 1994 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 27 L |