1994 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1994 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Alfa Romeo 164 (147 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Alfa Romeo 164 (187 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Alfa Romeo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Alfa Romeo 164 | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Triumph |
Model | 164 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1994 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 64 L |