1994 Alfa Romeo 33 vs. 1952 Allard K2
To start off, 1994 Alfa Romeo 33 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Alfa Romeo 33 (87 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Alfa Romeo 33 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1994 Alfa Romeo 33.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Alfa Romeo 33, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Alfa Romeo 33 | 1952 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
| Model | 33 | K2 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1351 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
