1994 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ (208 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ weights approximately 300 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Buick |
Model | RZ | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |