1994 Alfa Romeo RZ vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ (208 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ has manual transmission. 1994 Alfa Romeo RZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Alfa Romeo RZ | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Acura |
Model | RZ | TL |
Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1405 mm |