1994 Alpina B 12 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1994 Alpina B 12 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 905 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1994 Alpina B 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Alpina B 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 1994 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Alpina B 12 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Alpina | Riley |
Model | B 12 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1994 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2380 mm |