1994 Alpina B 12 vs. 1982 Chrysler E
To start off, 1994 Alpina B 12 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Alpina B 12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Alpina B 12 weights approximately 584 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 1994 Alpina B 12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Alpina B 12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm). This means 1994 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Alpina B 12 | 1982 Chrysler E | |
Make | Alpina | Chrysler |
Model | B 12 | E |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 179 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2630 mm |