1994 Alpina B 12 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 290 kg more than 1994 Alpina B 12.
Because 2002 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Alpina B 12. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Alpina B 12 (469 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 1994 Alpina B 12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Alpina B 12 | 2002 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Alpina | Chevrolet |
Model | B 12 | Astro |
Year Released | 1994 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 2080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2830 mm |