1994 Alpina B 12 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Alpina B 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Alpina B 12 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 204 kg more than 1994 Alpina B 12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Alpina B 12. (469 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Alpina B 12.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Alpina B 12 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Alpina | Cadillac |
Model | B 12 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1994 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 548 HP |
Torque | 469 Nm | 747 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1994 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2880 mm |