1994 Alpina B6 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1994 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Alpina B6 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Alpina | Toyota |
Model | B6 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1994 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2601 mm |