1994 Aston Martin Lagonda vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Aston Martin Lagonda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Aston Martin Lagonda would be higher. At 5,340 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Aston Martin Lagonda is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Aston Martin Lagonda | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Lagonda | Colt |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5340 cc | 2834 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2970 mm |
