1994 Audi A6 vs. 1980 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1994 Audi A6 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,984 cc, 1994 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Audi A6 (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1500. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1500.
Because 1980 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Audi A6 | 1980 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | A6 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1479 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2430 mm |
