1994 Audi A6 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1994 Audi A6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,461 cc, 1994 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Audi A6 | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A6 | Sigma |
Year Released | 1994 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2461 cc | 1597 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |