1994 Audi A6 vs. 2001 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Audi A6 | 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | XJ220 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2461 cc | 3492 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2230 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1160 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2720 mm |