1994 Audi A6 vs. 2003 Jaguar R-D6
To start off, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar R-D6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Audi A6 | 2003 Jaguar R-D6 | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | A6 | R-D6 |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2720 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2720 mm |