1994 Audi A6 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Audi A6 would be higher.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Audi A6 | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | A6 | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1994 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1585 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2550 mm |