1994 Audi A8 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Audi A8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Audi A8 would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Audi A8 (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 Audi A8 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Audi A8 weights approximately 405 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Audi A8 (400 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 1994 Audi A8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Audi A8 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A8 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1994 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4172 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |