1994 Audi Coupe vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Audi Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Audi Coupe would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Audi Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Roadster (157 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1994 Audi Coupe. (111 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Roadster should accelerate faster than 1994 Audi Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Audi Coupe weights approximately 70 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Audi Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda Roadster (170 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Audi Coupe. (168 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Audi Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1994 Audi Coupe | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | Coupe | Roadster |
Year Released | 1994 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2370 mm |