1994 Audi Coupe vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Audi Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Audi Coupe would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1994 Audi Coupe. (111 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1994 Audi Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 155 kg more than 1994 Audi Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Audi Coupe. (168 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Audi Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 Audi Coupe | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | Coupe | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1994 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |
