1994 BMW 316 vs. 1969 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1994 BMW 316 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1994 BMW 316. (103 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1994 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 940 kg more than 1994 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 BMW 316 | 1969 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 316 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 109.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 103.1 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3300 mm |
