1994 BMW 316 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1994 BMW 316 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1994 BMW 316. (103 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1994 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 335 kg more than 1994 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 BMW 316. (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 BMW 316 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | 316 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1969 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 5208 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 352 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1495 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 68 L |
