1994 BMW 316 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 BMW 316 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1994 BMW 316. (103 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1994 BMW 316.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 BMW 316. (150 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 BMW 316. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1994 BMW 316 has manual transmission. 1994 BMW 316 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1994 BMW 316 2010 Jaguar XF
Make BMW Jaguar
Model 316 XF
Year Released 1994 2010
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 103 HP 237 HP
Torque 150 Nm 500 Nm
Acceleration 0-100mph 12.6 seconds 6.7 seconds
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4220 mm 4961 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1877 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1461 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2908 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 L 70 L