1994 BMW 316 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 BMW 316 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1994 BMW 316. (103 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1994 BMW 316.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 BMW 316. (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1994 BMW 316 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 316 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1994 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 189 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 65 L |