1994 BMW 520 vs. 1972 Ford Maverick
To start off, 1994 BMW 520 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Maverick. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Maverick would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 BMW 520 (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1972 Ford Maverick. (81 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1972 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 BMW 520 weights approximately 234 kg more than 1972 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 BMW 520 (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Ford Maverick. (175 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1994 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
1994 BMW 520 | 1972 Ford Maverick | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 520 | Maverick |
Year Released | 1994 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1494 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |