1994 BMW 520 vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 BMW 520 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1994 BMW 520. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1994 BMW 520.
Because 1994 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1994 BMW 520 | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | BMW | Acura |
Model | 520 | TL |
Year Released | 1994 | 1996 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1405 mm |