1994 BMW 520 vs. 2007 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2007 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 BMW 520 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1994 BMW 520. (148 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1994 BMW 520.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford Mustang (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2007 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1994 BMW 520 | 2007 Ford Mustang | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 520 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1994 | 2007 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 105.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |