1994 BMW M3 vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 1994 BMW M3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 BMW M3 (281 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 BMW M3 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1994 BMW M3 | 1960 DKW Munga | |
| Make | BMW | DKW |
| Model | M3 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1994 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2990 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 281 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 7.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 31 L |
