1994 BMW M3 vs. 2007 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 BMW M3 (281 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 BMW M3 (320 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1994 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1994 BMW M3 | 2007 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1994 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2990 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 281 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 59 L |