1994 BMW M5 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 BMW M5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 BMW M5 would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 BMW M5 (335 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (213 HP @ 2800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1994 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 659 kg more than 1994 BMW M5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 BMW M5. (400 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 BMW M5.
Compare all specifications:
1994 BMW M5 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M5 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1994 | 1999 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3793 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 6900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 575 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1786 kg | 2445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3510 mm |